I’ve always believed cultural intelligence can help any relationship improve. But it wasn’t until I did the research that led to my book, Digital, Diverse & Divided, that I repeatedly saw specific ways cultural intelligence can help us navigate conversations surrounding sensitive topics like reproductive rights, January 6th, or the conflict between Israel and Palestine.

Here are four questions to help address polarizing topics with cultural intelligence:

1. Would you be open to considering a different perspective? (CQ Drive)

The number one trait that predicts cultural intelligence is openness and curiosity. If you aren’t open to considering a different way of thinking or behaving, it’s impossible to be culturally intelligent.

When someone is arguing about Trump, “woke” ideas, or a ceasefire, I stop and ask,  “Would you be open to considering a different perspective?” Rarely does someone respond, “Hell, no!”. But if they do, there’s little use in talking any further. I simply state my opinion and move on.

But beware. I’ve sometimes been too quick to assume someone is closed. My preferred conversation style is an amicable, diplomatic approach, even when discussing issues I feel strongly about. I can wrongfully interpret a more assertive confrontational approach as someone who is close minded when in fact, it might just be a difference in style. Other times I’ve been talking with someone who uses very measured, conciliatory language only to find out they weren’t open at all and were simply baiting me.

Use these indicators to assess openness: 

• Do they ask open-ended questions, demonstrating a genuine desire to understand?
• Are they’re willing to admit a statement was wrong or exaggerated?
• Can they point to something they respect about the “other” side, and something that troubles them about “their” side?
• Are they willing to say, “I don’t know”?

2.  Have I accurately understood your perspective? (CQ Knowledge)

Almost any behavior makes sense if you understand the perspective behind it. Cultural intelligence, of course, requires that we too are genuinely open to our counterpart’s perspective. I may never come to a point where I agree with your ideas and I may even decide they’re harmful or immoral. But if you understand the thinking, beliefs, and values behind someone’s behavior, you have the kind of understanding included in CQ Knowledge.

Perspective-taking is one of the critical skills we assess and teach as part of cultural intelligence. Social psychologist Adam Galinsky led a study on perspective-taking where students were shown a photo of an elderly man sitting on a chair next to a newspaper stand. The students were asked to write a short essay about a typical day for the man in the photo. Galinsky divided the students into three groups, telling the first group to simply look at the picture and describe the man’s day. The second group was told to write a description without using any stereotypes about elderly men. The third group was instructed to write the essay in the first person as if they were the man in the picture. 

The students in the first group used negative stereotypes to describe the man (lonely, declining physically, forgetful). The students told to avoid stereotypes wrote more neutral descriptions, making up scenarios about how the man might spend his time and what he thinks about. But the students who were asked to write the essay in the first person wrote the most positive descriptions of the man’s life, referring to his sage wisdom, his wide range of friendships, and the joy he finds in the simple things of life. Perspective-taking increases the likelihood that individuals will not only be less discriminatory in their thoughts and behaviors but will develop more positive viewpoints. When interacting with a friend or colleague about a polarizing issue, see if you can both describe the other’s perspective in neutral terms, ideally in the first person.

3. HOW would you solve this problem? (CQ Strategy)

Far too many polarizing conversations stop there. We agree to disagree or we get continually stalled ranting about what’s wrong with things rather than emphasizing solutions. A culturally intelligent approach collaboratively strategizes ways to address the problem.

Pay attention to how your counterpart wants to see change happen. Push them to explain the “how” rather than just repeating the “what.” How would you address inequitable pay, disproportionate rates of arrest, health disparities, etc.? How would you promote better opportunities for all working-class people, regardless of race?

A study on political extremism found that many citizens had very little understanding of the policies they opposed or supported. They just knew that something didn’t sit right with them. But individuals were more willing to open their minds to alternative approaches when they were asked how their preferred policies would work. Having to talk through the complexities of health-care legislation or immigration policy caused the individuals to see the nuance of the situation and acknowledge gaps in their knowledge. Overcoming polarization on issues like climate change or how to effectively promote racial equity requires an emphasis on problem-solving.

4. Where are you willing to compromise? (CQ Action)

Finally, overcoming polarization will never happen unless there’s a willingness to adjust our thinking and behavior. This is no different than when a diverse team is trying to figure out how to effectively work together despite different approaches to deadlines and communication styles. The culturally intelligent look for ways to adapt their behavior without compromising what’s core to their values and identity.

Sylvia is a French executive working for a Middle Eastern company in Dubai. She’s the only woman on the executive team, and the majority of leaders across the company are men. When interviewed for the position, Sylvia made it clear that she expected to be treated respectfully and equitably. They assured Sylvia they would respect her and demonstrated it with pay, title, and a direct reporting line to the CEO. Sylvia was unwilling to put on a submissive, deferential act to fit in with the male-dominated culture, but she found ways she could adapt to the cultural norms without losing herself in the process. 

In France it wasn’t uncommon for Sylvia to have lunch with a male colleague or client as a part of developing rapport and trust. But she avoids those kinds of lunches in her new role, believing it’s one small way to respect the boundaries between work and personal interactions across genders. When Sylvia joins the executive team for a work-related dinner, she refrains from ordering alcohol. But when she discovered that the company was ignoring a number of safety regulations, putting their construction teams at risk, she raised the issue immediately. She communicated her concern respectfully but unapologetically and forcefully. This is what CQ Action looks like. Sylvia is comfortable in her own skin, and she’s not trying to be all things to all people. But she adapts as needed to accomplish a larger objective. In the same way, when we confront polarizing topics, we can almost always find some areas where we can adjust our thinking and behavior without compromising our core values and identity.

There are no easy answers for how to address polarization. But rather than sequestering in our echo chambers and canceling anyone who disagrees, the same body of work that has helped organizations and executives build more inclusive, equitable cultures can help us talk with co-workers, friends, and family members who see the world differently than us. Together, we can build a more culturally intelligent world, one conversation at a time.

[This article includes excerpts from my newest book].